Boost Product Conversion by Leveraging Persuasive Design Principles
5 mins read
×
January 5, 2025
Product conversion is the ultimate goal of most digital products, whether it’s getting users to sign up, make a purchase, or take any other desired action. But how do you guide users toward these actions without overwhelming or losing them? Designing products goes deeper than just using tools like Figma; a significant part of product design involves learning how to influence user behavior to encourage the desired action. This is where persuasive design principles come in. The Fogg Behavior Model (FBM) for persuasive design is a proven behavioral psychology framework used by top companies like Duolingo, Instagram, and TikTok. By aligning your design with this framework, you can create experiences that drive action while keeping your users engaged and satisfied. Here’s how you can leverage this framework to boost product conversion rates with strategies grounded in psychology and user behavior:
Understanding Persuasive Design
The Interaction Design Foundation defines persuasive design as an area of design practice that focuses on influencing human behavior through a product’s or service’s characteristics. In 2009, a behavioral scientist and director of the Behavior Design Lab at Stanford University, Dr BJ Fogg introduced the Fogg Behavioral Model (FBM) for persuasive design.
The FBM asserts that for a person to perform a target behavior, he or she must be sufficiently motivated, have the ability to perform the behavior, and be triggered to perform the behavior. These three factors must occur at the same moment, else the behavior will not happen.
At its core, persuasive design works by influencing behavior through three key factors: Motivation, Ability, and Triggers. The FBM suggests that by understanding these factors and designing products and services with them in mind, designers can encourage desired user behaviors without resorting to negative approaches like coercion or deception. Now, let's explore these factors.
Figure 1 demonstrates that for a user to take the desired action, they need to have high motivation and high ability, followed by a timely trigger. The arrow indicates that as a person's motivation and ability increase, the likelihood of performing the target behavior also increases.
Image credit: Fogg Behavioral Model
Motivation: Why would a user want to take the action?
Motivation refers to the user's desire to take action, ranging from low to high. Fogg asserts that motivation is influenced by three core motivators:
Sensation: This involves the desire to experience pleasure or avoid pain.
Anticipation: This pertains to the desire to achieve hope or avoid fear.
Belonging: This relates to the desire for social acceptance or the fear of social rejection.
Each of these motivators has two sides:
Sensation: Pleasure/Pain
Anticipation: Hope/Fear
Belonging: Acceptance/Rejection
An example of pleasure as a motivator can be found in the social media and gamification industries, where users often seek a pleasurable reward or a dopamine boost after completing a desired action. On the other hand, pain is a strong motivator in the fitness industry, where individuals often driven by personal experiences like a painful breakup or body-shaming, turn to the gym as a form of emotional healing. Hope and fear are commonly used in industries like dating and insurance, where the potential for positive outcomes or the fear of negative consequences drive behavior. Meanwhile, social acceptance and rejection are powerful motivators in the social media space, where the desire for validation and fear of exclusion influence user actions.
This emphasizes the need for designers to understand their users' motivations and integrate them into the design. This can be through text, gamification, personalization, or other methods compatible with the system being designed.
I could go in-depth into the different aspects, but that would make this blog post quite long. So, I’ll stick to the important bits, but don’t worry, you can read more at the end of the article through the reference section
Ability: How easy is it for the user to perform the action?
In the Fogg Behavior Model (FBM), ability refers to the user's capacity to perform a desired behavior. The FBM asserts that humans are fundamentally lazy, therefore performing an action that feels difficult, different from routine or requires too them to learn something new will be perceived as not simple, thereby reducing their ability to perform it. For persuasive design to be effective, it must ensure that the target behavior is within the user's ability to perform. If a behavior is too complex or demanding, even high motivation may not lead to action.
The FBM states that simplicity is a function of a person's scarcest resources at the moment a behavior is prompted and it breaks it down into six parts, often referred to as the simplicity elements. These elements help designers evaluate and reduce the difficulty of a task to increase the user's ability to perform it. The six parts of simplicity are:
Time: How much time does the behavior take? The less time required, the simpler the behavior becomes.
Money: What is the financial cost associated with the behavior? Lower costs make a behavior easier to perform.
Physical Effort: How much physical effort is needed? Less effort increases simplicity.
Mental Effort: How much cognitive load or mental effort does the behavior demand? A simpler behavior requires minimal thinking or decision-making.
Social Deviance: Does the behavior fit within social norms, or does it feel deviant? Behaviors aligned with social norms are easier for users to perform.
Non-Routine: Is the behavior something the user is accustomed to, or is it unfamiliar? Routine behaviors are easier, while new or non-routine actions require more effort.
This highlights the importance for designers to find out the scarcest resource for their audience, be it time, cognitive capacity, physical effort, or money and account for it in their UX. Additionally, this principle can be applied when evaluating a product's churn rate to uncover what aspects of the process are overly complex, leading users to drop off.
Triggers: What prompts the user to act at the right time?
Triggers are cues or prompts that initiate a behavior. These can be notifications, visual cues, or contextual prompts that nudge the user when they’re most likely to respond. Even if motivation and ability are high, a behavior won’t occur without an effective trigger. Triggers come in three main types, depending on the user’s state:
Spark: Used when motivation is low. A spark trigger aims to inspire action by appealing to emotions or providing a compelling reason to act. Sparks can also be used to increase motivation and can be applied when a user has high ability but low levels of motivation. For example, a motivational notification encouraging exercise.
Facilitator: Used when ability is low. This type of trigger makes the action easier to perform by providing guidance or simplifying the process. For instance, a tutorial or a tooltip in a user interface.
Signal: Used when both motivation and ability are already high. A signal is a straightforward reminder or nudge to perform the behavior, such as an alarm reminding someone to take medication.
Effective triggers are timely, relevant, and designed to match the user’s current motivation and ability. Timing is critical. A poorly timed trigger can annoy users, while a well-timed one feels helpful and intuitive. Without a well-placed trigger, even the most motivated and capable users may fail to take action.
How We Can Utilize This as Designers
As designers, we can take these steps to leverage these principles and guide users toward the desired action:
Identify Motivation Drivers: Understand what motivates your users. Are they seeking pleasure, avoiding pain, or looking for social validation? Align your design elements to these drivers by creating emotional connections through gamification, rewards, or user testimonials.
Simplify User Actions: Reduce friction by making tasks easier. This includes shortening forms, offering autofill options, and streamlining navigation. When users encounter minimal effort to perform an action, they are more likely to convert.
Implement Effective Triggers: Design timely and contextually relevant triggers to nudge users toward action. Use sparks to inspire motivation, facilitators to simplify processes, and signals to remind users without being intrusive.
Test and Iterate Continuously: Use tools like A/B testing and heatmaps to refine your designs. Understand what resonates with your users and optimize accordingly to enhance their experience.
Focus on Ethical Practices: While persuasive design can boost conversion rates, it’s essential to use these principles responsibly. Avoid “dark pattern” design tactics that manipulate users into actions they didn’t intend, like hidden fees or overly aggressive pop-ups. Building trust with your audience ensures long-term success and loyalty.Ensure your designs respect user trust. Prioritize transparency to build lasting relationships with your audience.
TLDR
Persuasive design is a powerful tool that can shape user behavior by understanding and leveraging key principles like motivation, ability, and triggers. By creating experiences that align with users' intrinsic desires, simplifying tasks, and providing timely prompts, designers can encourage positive actions that benefit both users and businesses.
Ultimately, the goal is to design with empathy and purpose, crafting seamless, engaging interactions that guide users naturally toward desired outcomes while keeping their needs and motivations at the forefront. Through thoughtful application of persuasive design techniques, we can create products that not only drive action but also enhance the overall user experience.
References:
Fogg, B. J. (n.d.). Behavior model. Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://behaviormodel.org/
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Captology: The study of computers as persuasive technologies (PDF). Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://www.demenzemedicinagenerale.net/images/mens-sana/Captology_Fogg_Behavior_Model.pdf
